IRS Updates Allowable Living Expense Standards for 2023 The IRS has updated the Allowable Living Expense (ALE) Standards, effective April 24, 2023.The ALE standards reduce subjectivity when determining what a taxpayer may claim as basic living ...
MS - Washington County reenacts 2% Hotel Tax Effective April 17, 2023, Mississippi has re-enacted the 2% Washington County Hotel Tax levied on the gross proceeds derived from hotel and motel room rentals in the county, excluding charges for tele...
TX - Franchise tax treatment of broadband deployment grant funds Texas has enacted legislation specifying the franchise tax treatment of proceeds from certain governmental grants for the purpose of investments in broadband infrastructure in Texas. For franchise tax...
WASHINGTON—The Internal Revenue Service will be resuming issuing collectionsnotices to taxpayers that were previously suspending during the COVID-19 pandemic, although a date on when they will begin to be sent out has not been set.
WASHINGTON—TheInternal Revenue Servicewill be resuming issuingcollectionsnoticesto taxpayers that were previously suspending during the COVID-19 pandemic, although a date on when they will begin to be sent out has not been set.
"Right now, we are planning for restarting thosenotices,"Darren Guillot, commissioner forcollectionand operation support in theIRSSmall Business/Self Employment Division, said May 5, 2023, during a panel discussion at the ABA May Tax Meeting."We have a very detailed plan."
Guillot assured attendees that the plan does not involve everynoticejust starting up on an unannounced day. Rather, theIRSwill"communicate vigorously"with taxpayers, tax professionals and Congress on the timing of the plans so no one will be caught off guard by their generation.
He also stated that the plan is to stagger the issuance of different types ofnoticesto make sure the agency is not overwhelmed with responses to them.
"Thenoticerestart is really going to be staggered,"Guillot said."We’re going to time it at an appropriate cadence so that we believe we can handle the incoming phone calls that it can generate."
Guillot continued:"We want to also be mindful of the impact that it will have on theIRSIndependent Office of Appeal. Some of thosenoticescome with appeals rights and we want to make sure that we give taxpayers a chance to resolve their issues without the need to have to go to appeal or even get to that stage of thatnotice. So, it will be a staggered process."
In terms of helping to avoid the appeals process and getting taxpayers back into compliance, Guillot offered a scenario of what taxpayers might expect. In the example, if a taxpayer was set to receive a finalNoticeof Intent to Levy right before the pause for the pandemic was instituted,"we’re probably going to give most of those taxpayers a gentle remindernoticeto try and see if they want to comply before we go straight to that finalnotice. That’s good for the taxpayer and it’s good for theIRS. And it’s good for the appellate process as well."
Guillot also said the agency is going to look at the totality of the 500-series ofnoticesand taxpayers and their circumstances to see if there is a more efficient way of communicating and collecting past due amounts from taxpayers.
He also stressed that theIRShas been working with National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins and she has offered"input that we’re incorporating and taking into consideration every step of the way."
Collins, who also was on the panel, confirmed that and added that theIRSis"trying to take a very reasonable approach of how to turn it back on,"adding that the staggered approach will also help practitioners and the Taxpayer Advocate Service from being overwhelmed as well as theIRS.
Guillot also mentioned that in the very near future, theIRSwill start generating CP-14notices, which are the statutory duenotices. This is the firstnoticethat a taxpayer will receive at the end of a tax season when there is money that they owe and those will start to be sent out to taxpayers around the end of May.
The Internal Revenue Service will use 2018 as the benchmarkyear for determining auditrates as it plans to increase enforcement for those individuals and businesses making more than $400,000 per year.
The Internal Revenue Service will use2018as thebenchmarkyearfor determiningauditratesas it plans to increase enforcement for those individuals and businesses making more than $400,000 peryear.
The agency is"going to be focused completely on … closing the gap,"IRS Commissioner Daniel said April 27, 2023, during ahearingof the House Ways and Means Committee."What that means is theauditrate, the most recentauditrate, we have that’s complete and final is2018. That is theratethat I want to share with the American people. Theauditratewill not go above thatrateforyearsto come because for the next severalyears, at least, we’re going to be focused on work that we’re doing with the highest income filers."
Werfeladded that even if the IRS were to expand itsauditfootprint a fewyearsfrom now,"you’re still not going to get anywhere near that historical average for quite some time. So, I think there can be assurances to the American people that if you earn under $400,000, there’s no new wave ofauditscoming. The probability of you beingauditedbefore the Inflation Reduction Act and after the Inflation Reduction Act are not changed at all."
He also noted that many of the new hires that will be brought in to handle enforcement will focus on the wealthiest individuals and businesses.Werfelsaid that there currently are only 2,600 employees that cover filings of the wealthiest 390,000 filers and that is where many of the enforcement hires will be used.
"We have to up our game if we’re going to effectively assess whether these organizations are paying what they owe,"he testified."So, it’s about hiring. It’s about training. And it’s not just hiring auditors, it’s about hiring economists, scientists, engineers. And when I [say] scientists, I mean data scientists to truly help us strategically figure out where the gaps are so we can close those gaps."
Werfeldid sidestep a question about the potential need for actually increasing the number ofauditsfor those making under $400,000. When asked about a Joint Committee on Taxation report that found that more than 90 percent of unreported income actually came from taxpayers earning less than $400,000, he responded that"there is a lot of mounting evidence that there is significant underreporting or tax gap in the highest income filers. For example, there’s a study that was done by the U.S. Treasury Department that looked at the top one percent of Americans and found that as much as $163 billion of tax dodging, roughly."
And while answering the questions on the need for more personnel to handle theauditsof the wealthy, he did acknowledge that"a big driver"of needing such a large workforce to handle the filings of wealthy taxpayers is due to the complexity of the tax code, in addition to a growing population, a growing economy, and an increasing number of wealthy taxpayers.
Other Topics Covered
Werfel’s testimony covered a wide range of topics, from the size and role of the personnel to be hired to the offering of service that has the IRS fill out tax forms for filers to technology and security upgrade, similar to a round of questions the agency commissioner faced before the Senate Finance Committee in ahearinga week earlier.
He reiterated that a study is expected to arrive mid-May that will report on the feasibility of the IRS offering a service to fill out tax forms for taxpayers.Werfelstressed that if such a service were to be offered, it would be strictly optional and there would be no plans to make using such a service mandatory.
"Our hope and our vision [is] that we will meet taxpayers where they are,"he testified."If they want to file on paper, we’re not thrilled with it, but we’ll be ready for it. If they want the fully digital experience, if they want to work with a third-party servicer, we want to accommodate that."
Werfelalso reiterated a commitment to examine the use of cloud computing as a way to modernize the IRS’s information technology infrastructure.
And he also continued his call for an increase in annual appropriations to compliment the funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act. He testified that modernization funds were"raided"so that phones could be answered and to prevent service levels from declining while still being able to modernize the agency, more annual funds will need to be appropriated.
The Supreme Court has held that the exception to the notice requirement in Code Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i) does not apply where a delinquenttaxpayer has a legalinterest in accounts or recordssummoned by the IRS under Code Sec. 7602(a). The IRS had entered official assessments against an individual for unpaid taxes and penalties, following which a revenue officer had issued summonses to three banks seeking financial records of several third parties, including the taxpayers. Subsequently, the taxpayers moved to quash the summonses. The District Court concluded that, under Code Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i), no notice was required and that taxpayers, therefore, could not bring a motion to quash.
The Supreme Court has held that the exception to the notice requirement inCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i)does not apply where adelinquenttaxpayerhas alegalinterestin accounts orrecordssummonedby theIRSunderCode Sec. 7602(a). TheIRShad entered official assessments against an individual for unpaid taxes and penalties, following which a revenue officer had issued summonses to three banks seeking financialrecordsof several third parties, including thetaxpayers. Subsequently, thetaxpayersmoved to quash the summonses. The District Court concluded that, underCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i), no notice was required and thattaxpayers, therefore, could not bring a motion to quash. The Court of Appeals also affirmed, finding that the summonses fell within the exception inCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i)to the general notice requirement.
Exceptions to Notice Requirement
Thetaxpayersargued that the exception to the notice requirement inCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i)applies only if thedelinquenttaxpayerhas alegalinterestin the accounts orrecordssummonedby theIRS. However, the statute does not mentionlegalinterestand does not require that ataxpayermaintain such aninterestfor the exception to apply. Further, thetaxpayers’ arguments in support of their proposedlegalinteresttest, failed. Thetaxpayersfirst contended that the phrase"in aid of the collection"would not be accomplished by summons unless it was targeted at an account containing assets that theIRScan collect to satisfy thetaxpayers’ liability. However, a summons might not itself revealtaxpayerassets that can be collected but it might help theIRSfind such assets.
Thetaxpayers’ second argument that ifCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i)is read to exempt every summons from notice that would help theIRScollect an"assessment"against adelinquenttaxpayer, there would be no work left for the second exception to notice, found inCode Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(ii). However, clause (i) applies upon an assessment, while clause (ii) applies upon a finding of liability. In addition, clause (i) concernsdelinquenttaxpayers, while clause (ii) concerns transferees or fiduciaries. As a result, clause (ii) permits theIRSto issue unnoticed summonses to aid its collection from transferees or fiduciaries before it makes an official assessment of liability. Consequently,Code Sec. 7609(c)(2)(D)(i)does not require that ataxpayermaintain alegalinterestinrecordssummonedby theIRS.
An IRSnotice provides interim guidance describing rules that the IRS intends to include in proposedregulations regarding the domesticcontentbonuscredit requirements for:
AnIRSnoticeprovides interim guidance describing rules that theIRSintends to include inproposedregulationsregarding thedomesticcontentbonuscreditrequirements for:
--theCode Sec. 45electricity productiontax credit,
--the newCode Sec. 45Yclean electricity productioncredit,
Thenoticealso provides a safe harbor regarding the classification of certaincomponentsin representative types of qualified facilities,energyprojects, orenergystorage technologies. Finally, itdescribesrecordkeeping and certification requirements for thedomesticcontentbonuscredit.
Taxpayer Reliance
Taxpayers may rely on thenoticefor any qualified facility,energyproject, orenergystorage technology the construction of which begins before the date that is 90 days after the date of publication of the forthcomingproposedregulationsin theFederal Register.
TheIRSintends to propose that theproposedregswill apply to tax years ending after May 12, 2023.
DomesticContentBonusRequirements
Thenoticedefinesseveralterms that are relevant to thedomesticcontentbonuscredit, including manufactured, manufactured product, manufacturing process, mined and produced. In addition, thenoticeextendsdomesticcontenttest to retrofitted projects that satisfy the 80/20 rule for new and used property.
Thenoticealso provides detailed rules for satisfying the requirement that at least 40 percent (or 20 percent for an offshore wind facility) of steel, iron or manufactured productcomponentsare produced in the United States. In particular, thenoticeprovides an Adjusted Percentage Rule for determining whether manufactured productcomponentsare produced in the U.S.
Safe Harbor for Classifying ProductComponents
The safe harbor applies to a variety of projectcomponents. A table list thecomponents, the project that might use eachcomponent, and assigns eachcomponentto either the steel/iron category or the manufactured product category.
The table is not exhaustive. In addition,componentslisted in the table must still meet the relevant statutory requirements for the particularcreditto be eligible for thedomesticcontentbonuscredit.
Certification and Substantiation
Finally, thenoticeexplains that a taxpayer that claims thedomesticcontentbonuscreditmust certify that a project meets thedomesticcontentrequirement as of the date the project is placed in service. The taxpayer must also satisfy the general income tax recordkeeping requirements to substantiate thecredit.
A taxpayer certifies a project by submitting aDomesticContentCertification Statement to theIRScertifying that any steel, iron or manufactured product that is subject to thedomesticcontenttest was produced in the U.S. The taxpayer must attach the statement to the form that reports thecredit. The taxpayer must continue to attach the form to the relevantcreditform for subsequent tax years.
A married couple’s petition for redetermination of an income tax deficiency was untimely where they electronicallyfiled their petition from the central timezone but after the due date in the eastern timezone, where the Tax Court is located. Accordingly, the taxpayers’ case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
A married couple’spetitionfor redetermination of an incometaxdeficiency was untimely where theyelectronicallyfiledtheirpetitionfrom the centraltimezonebut after theduedate in the easterntimezone, where theTax Courtis located. Accordingly, the taxpayers’ case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
The deadline for the taxpayers to file apetitionin theTax Courtwas July 18, 2022. The taxpayers were living in Alabama when theyelectronicallyfiledtheirpetition. At thetimeof filing, theTax Court's electronic case management system (DAWSON) automatically applied a cover sheet to theirpetition. The cover sheet showed that thecourtelectronicallyreceived thepetitionat 12:05 a.m. easterntimeon July 19, 2022, andfiledit the same day. However, when theTax Courtreceived thepetition, it was 11:05 p.m. centraltimeon July 18, 2022, in Alabama.
ElectronicallyFiledPetition
The taxpayers’petitionwas untimely because it wasfiledafter theduedate underCode Sec. 6213(a).Tax CourtRule 22(d) dictates that the last day of a period for electronic filing ends at 11:59 p.m. easterntime, theTax Court’s localtimezone. Further, the timely mailing rule underCode Sec. 7502(a)applies only to documents that are delivered by U.S. mail or a designated delivery service, not to anelectronicallyfiledpetition.
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Daniel Werfel said changes are coming to addressracialdisparities among those who get audited annually.
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner DanielWerfelsaid changes are coming toaddressracialdisparitiesamong those who getauditedannually.
"I will stay laser-focused on this to ensure that we identify and implement changes prior to the next tax filing season,"Werfelstated in a May 15, 2023,letterto Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
The issue ofracialdisparitieswas raised duringWerfel’s confirmation hearing an in subsequent hearings before Congress after taking over as commissioner in the wake of astudyissued by Stanford University that found that African American taxpayers areauditedat three to five times the rate of other taxpayers.
The IRS"is committed to enforcing tax laws in a manner that is fair and impartial,"Werfelwrote in the letter."When evidence of unfair treatment is presented, we must take immediate actions toaddressit."
He emphasized that the agency does not and"will not consider race as part of our case selection andauditprocesses."
He noted that the Stanford study suggested that theauditswere triggered by taxpayers claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit.
"We are deeply concerned by these findings and committed to doing the work to understand andaddressany disparate impact of the actions we take,"he wrote, adding that the agency has been studying the issue since he has taken over as commissioner and that the work is ongoing.Werfelsuggested that initial findings of IRS research into the issue"support the conclusion that Black taxpayers may beauditedat higher rates than would be expected given their share of the population."
Werfeladded that elements in the Inflation Reduction Act Strategic Operating Plan include commitments to"conducting research to understand any systemic bias in compliance strategies and treatment. … The ongoing evaluation of our EITCauditselection algorithms is the topmost priority within this larger body of work, and we are committed to transparency regarding our research findings as the work matures."
The American Institute of CPAs expressed support for legislation pending in the Senate that would redefine when electronic payments to the Internal Revenue Service are considered timely.
The American Institute of CPAs expressed support forlegislationpending in the Senate that would redefine when electronic payments to the Internal Revenue Service are considered timely.
In a May 3, 2023, letter to Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), theAICPAapplauded the legislators for The Electronic Communication UniformityAct(S. 1338), which would treat electronic payments made to the IRS as timely at the point they are submitted, not at the point they are processed, which is how they are currently treated. The move would make the treatment similar to physically mailed payments, which are considered timely based on the post mark indicating when they are mailed, not when the payment physically arrives at the IRS or when the agency processes it.
S. 1338 was introduced by Sen. Blackburn on April 27, 2023. At press time, Sen. Cortez Masto is the only co-sponsor to the bill.
The bill adopts a recommendation included by the National Taxpayer Advocate in the annual so-called"Purple Book"of legislative recommendations made to Congress by the NTA. The Purple Book notes that IRS does not have the authority to apply themailboxrule to electronic payments and it would need anactof Congress to make the change.
"Your bill would provide welcome relief and solve a problem that taxpayers have been faced with, i.e., incurring penalties through no fault of their own because they believed their filings or payments were timely submitted through an electronic platform,"theAICPAletter states. Thislegislationwould provide equity by treating similarly situated taxpayers similarly. It would also improve tax administration by eliminating IRS notices assessing unnecessary penalties when the taxpayer or practitioner electronically submits a tax return by the deadline regardless of when the IRS processes it.
Tax policy and comment letters submitted to the government can be foundhere.
WASHINGTON—The Inflation Reduction ActStrategicOperatingPlanwas designed to be alivingdocument, an Internal Revenue Service official said.
Theplan, which outlines how the IRSplansto spend the additional nearly $80 billion in supplemental funds allocated to it in the Inflation Reduction Act, was written to be a"livingdocument. It’s not meant to be something static that stays on the shelf and never gets updated, and just becomes an historic relic,"Bridget Roberts, head of the IRS Transformation and Strategy Office, said May 5, 2023, at the ABA May Tax Meeting.
WASHINGTON—The Inflation Reduction ActStrategicOperatingPlanwas designed to be alivingdocument, an Internal Revenue Service official said.
Theplan, which outlines how the IRSplansto spend the additional nearly $80 billion in supplemental funds allocated to it in the Inflation Reduction Act, was written to be a"livingdocument. It’s not meant to be something static that stays on the shelf and never gets updated, and just becomes an historic relic,"Bridget Roberts, head of the IRS Transformation and Strategy Office, said May 5, 2023, at the ABA May Tax Meeting.
Roberts also described theplanas a tool to help bring the agency together and more unified in its mission.
"We intentionally wrote theplanto sort of break down some of those institutional silos,"she said."So, we didn’t write it based on business unit or function."
She framed the development of theplana"cross-functional, cross-agency effort,"adding that it"wasn’t like, ‘here’s how we’re going to change wage and investment or large business.’ It was, ‘here’s how we’re going to change service and enforcement and technology. And those pieces touch everything."
Roberts also highlighted the need for better data analytics across the agency, something that the SOP emphasizes particularly as it beings to ramp up enforcement activities to help close the tax gap.
"We are never going to be able to hire at a level that you can audit everybody,"she said."So, the ability to use data and analytics to really focus our resources on where we think there is true noncompliance,"rather than conducting audits that result in no changes."That’s not helpful for taxpayers. That’s not helpful for the IRS."
The IRS Independent Office of Appeals, in coordination with the National Taxpayer Advocate, has invited publicfeedback on how it can improve conference options for taxpayers and representatives who are not located near an Appeals office, encourage participation of taxpayers with limited English proficiency and ensure accessibility by persons with disabilities. Taxpayers can send their comments to ap.taxpayer.experience@irs.gov by July 10, 2023.
TheIRSIndependent Office ofAppeals, in coordination with the National Taxpayer Advocate, has invitedpublicfeedbackon how it can improve conference options for taxpayers and representatives who are not located near anAppealsoffice, encourage participation of taxpayers with limited English proficiency and ensure accessibility by persons with disabilities. Taxpayers can send their comments toap.taxpayer.experience@irs.govby July 10, 2023.
Appealsresolve federal tax disputes through conferences, wherein anappealsofficer will engage with taxpayers in a way that is fair and impartial to taxpayers as well as the government to discuss potential settlements. Additionally, taxpayers can resolve their disputes by mail or secure messaging. Although, conferences are offered by telephone, video, the mode of meeting withAppealsis completely decided by the taxpayer. Recently,appealsexpandedaccesstovideo conferencingto meet taxpayer needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, taxpayers and representatives who prefer to meet withAppealsin person have the option to do so as,appealshas a presence in over 60 offices across 40 states where they can host in-person conferences.
Technical corrections to the partnership audit rules were included in the bipartisan Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA), 2018 ( P.L. 115-141), which was signed by President Trump on March 23. The omnibus spending package, which provides funding for the government and federal agencies through September 30, contains several tax provisions, including technical corrections to the partnership audit provisions of the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2015 ( P.L. 114-74).
Technical corrections to the partnership audit rules were included in the bipartisan Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA), 2018 ( P.L. 115-141), which was signed by President Trump on March 23. The omnibus spending package, which provides funding for the government and federal agencies through September 30, contains several tax provisions, including technical corrections to the partnership audit provisions of the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2015 ( P.L. 114-74).
Scope The CAA clarifies the scope of the partnership audit rules. The new rules are not narrower than the TEFRA partnership audit rules; they are intended to have a scope sufficient to address partnership-related items. The CAA eliminated references to adjustments to partnership income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, and replaced them with partnership-related items. "Partnership-related items" are any item or amount that is relevant to determining the income tax liability of any partner, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT). Among other things, partnership-related items include an imputed underpayment, or an item or amount relating to any transaction with, basis in, or liability of the partnership.
According to the JCT, the partnership audit rules do not apply to withholding taxes except as specifically provided. However, any partnership income tax adjustment will be considered when determining and assessing withholding taxes when the partnership adjustment is relevant to that determination. Further, the technical corrections clarify that an imputed partnership underpayment is determined by appropriately netting partnership adjustments for that year, and then applying the highest rate of tax for the reviewed year.
Pull-In; Push-Out Also included in the CAA is a "pull-in" procedure, which allows for modifying an imputed underpayment without requiring individual partners to file an amended tax return. The "pull-in" procedure, if elected, would replace the "push-out" election. A push-out shifts liability to individual partners. The "pull-in" procedure contemplates that partner payments and information could be collected centrally by the IRS. However, the procedure permits the partnership representative or a third-party accounting or law firm to collect the data and remit it to the IRS.
Penalties The partnership adjustment tracking report required in a push out is a return for purposes of failure to file, frivolous submission, and return preparer penalties. Also, the failure to furnish statements in a push-out is subject to the failure to file or pay tax penalties. However, neither an administrative adjustment request nor a partnership adjustment tracking report are returns for purposes of the partner amended return modification procedures.
The much-anticipated regulations (REG-136118-15) implementing the new centralized partnership audit regime under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA) have finally been released. The BBA regime replaces the current TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982) procedures beginning for 2018 tax year audits, with an earlier "opt-in" for electing partnerships. Originally issued on January 19, 2017 but delayed by a January 20, 2017 White House regulatory freeze, these re-proposed regulations carry with them much of the same criticism leveled against them back in January, as well as several modifications. Most importantly, their reach will impact virtually all partnerships.
The much-anticipated regulations (REG-136118-15) implementing the new centralized partnership audit regime under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA) have finally been released. The BBA regime replaces the current TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982) procedures beginning for 2018 tax year audits, with an earlier "opt-in" for electing partnerships. Originally issued on January 19, 2017 but delayed by a January 20, 2017 White House regulatory freeze, these re-proposed regulations carry with them much of the same criticism leveled against them back in January, as well as several modifications. Most importantly, their reach will impact virtually all partnerships.
Scope
Under the proposed regulations, to which Congress left many details to be filled in, the new audit regime covers any adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership and any partner’s distributive share of those adjusted items. Further, any income tax resulting from an adjustment to items under the centralized partnership audit regime is assessed and collected at the partnership level. The applicability of any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount that relates to an adjustment to any such item or share is also determined at the partnership level.
Immediate Impact
Although perhaps streamlined and eventually destined to simplify partnership audits for the IRS, the new centralized audit regime may prove more complicated in several respects for many partnerships. Of immediate concern for most partnerships, whether benefiting or not, is how to reflect this new centralized audit regime within partnership agreements, especially when some of the procedural issues within the new regime are yet to be ironed out.
Issues for many partnerships that have either been generated or heightened by the new regulations include:
Selecting a method of satisfying an imputed underpayment;
Designation of a partnership representative;
Allocating economic responsibility for an imputed underpayment among partners including situations in which partners’ interests change between a reviewed year and the adjustment year; and
Indemnifications between partnerships and partnership representatives, as well as among current partners and those who were partners during the tax year under audit.
Election out
Starting for tax year 2018, virtually all partnerships will be subject to the new partnership audit regime …unless an “election out” option is affirmatively elected. Only an eligible partnership may elect out of the centralized partnership audit regime. A partnership is an eligible partnership if it has 100 or fewer partners during the year and, if at all times during the tax year, all partners are eligible partners. A special rule applies to partnerships that have S corporation partners.
Consistent returns
A partner’s treatment of each item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit attributable to a partnership must be consistent with the treatment of those items on the partnership return, including treatment with respect to the amount, timing, and characterization of those items. Under the new rules, the IRS may assess and collect any underpayment of tax that results from adjusting a partner’s inconsistently reported item to conform that item with the treatment on the partnership return as if the resulting underpayment of tax were on account of a mathematical or clerical error appearing on the partner’s return. A partner may not request an abatement of that assessment.
Partnership representative
The new regulations require a partnership to designate a partnership representative, as well as provide rules describing the eligibility requirements for a partnership representative, the designation of the partnership representative, and the representative’s authority. Actions by the partnership representative bind all the partners as far as the IRS is concerned. Indemnification agreements among partners may ameliorate some, but not all, of the liability triggered by this rule.
Imputed underpayment, alternatives and "push-outs"
Generally, if a partnership adjustment results in an imputed underpayment, the partnership must pay the imputed underpayment in the adjustment year. The partnership may request modification with respect to an imputed underpayment only under the procedures described in the new rules.
In multi-tiered partnership arrangements, the new rules provide that a partnership may elect to "push out" adjustments to its reviewed year partners. If a partnership makes a valid election, the partnership is no longer liable for the imputed underpayment. Rather, the reviewed year partners of the partnership are liable for tax, penalties, additions to tax, and additional amounts plus interest, after taking into account their share of the partnership adjustments determined in the final partnership adjustment (FPA). The new regulations provide rules for making the election, the requirements for partners to file statements with the IRS and furnish statements to reviewed year partners, and the computation of tax resulting from taking adjustments into account.
Retiring, disappearing partners
Partnership agreements that reflect the new partnership audit regime must especially consider the problems that may be created by partners that have withdrawn, and partnerships that have since dissolved, between the tax year being audited and the year in which a deficiency involving that tax year is to be resolved. Collection of prior-year taxes due from a former partner, especially as time lapses, becomes more difficult as a practical matter unless specific remedies are set forth in the partnership agreement. The partnership agreement might specify that if any partner withdraws and disposes of their interest, they must keep the partnership advised of their contact information until released by the partnership in writing.
If you have any questions about how your partnership may be impacted by these new rules, please feel free to call our office.
Legislation enacted in 2015 provides new rules for IRS partnership audits. The new rules are a drastic departure from current rules and the IRS is hopeful that the rules will simplify the audit process and allow the IRS to conduct more partnership audits.
Legislation enacted in 2015 provides new rules for IRS partnership audits. The new rules are a drastic departure from current rules and the IRS is hopeful that the rules will simplify the audit process and allow the IRS to conduct more partnership audits.
The provisions do not take effect until partnership tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, until an existing partnership may elect to apply the new rules to tax years after November 2, 2015. The IRS is working on guidance for the new audit regime and has requested comments by April 15, although agency officials said that comments after that date will be accepted.
Background
Under current rules, as provided by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), when the IRS audits a partnership with more than 10 partners, the IRS determines any changes to the partnership return in a single administrative proceeding with the partnership. The partnership must designate a tax matters partner (the “TMP”) to handle the audit and any subsequent litigation. After determining the appropriate adjustments for the partnership as a whole, the IRS must recalculate the tax liability of each partner for the year under audit.
For partnerships with 10 or fewer partners, the IRS must audit the partner and the partnership separately. These small partnerships may elect to be audited under the TEFRA procedures.
Electing out
A partnership with 100 or fewer partners may opt out of the new regime. Partnerships that elect out will be audited under the general rules for individual taxpayers. Unlike the TEFRA regime, which applies TEFRA to partnerships with 11 or more partners, the new rules will not apply unless the partnership has over 100 partners. Thus, the IRS conceivably would have to conduct up to 100 audits of individual taxpayers.
The Tax Code requires that partners be individuals, C corporations, foreign entities that would be domestic C corporations, S corporations (special rules apply for counting owners as partners), and estates of deceased partners. The number of partners would be based on the number of Schedules K-1 issued by the partnership. The IRS may prescribe rules for treating other entities as eligible partners.
Partnership representative
Unlike the TMP procedures under TEFRA, the partnership will designate a partnership representative (PR) to deal with the IRS, who does not have to be a partner. The PR will have sole authority to act on behalf of the partnership. The partnership and all partners will be bound by the actions of the partnership. The new law does away with TEFRA rights for individual partners to receive notice of the audit and to participate in the audit. Partnerships could organize a group of partners to advise the PR.
Partnership/partner liability
The partnership will pay an IRS audit adjustment (the “imputed underpayment”) unless the partnership elects to provide each partner (and the IRS) with a statement of the partner’s share of the adjustment. Partnerships that pay the tax will provide amended Schedules K-1 to their partners. Thus, under the new law, the partnership will determine the partner’s liability for the increase in taxes that the partnership pays; under TEFRA, the IRS had to calculate the partners’ adjustments.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
Vehicle donations
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), there are approximately 250 million registered passenger motor vehicles in the United States. The U.S. is the largest passenger vehicle market in the world. Potentially, each one of these vehicles could be a charitable donation and that is why the IRS takes such a sharp look at contributions of used vehicles and claims for tax deductions. The possibility for abuse of the charitable contribution rules is large.
Bona fide charities
Before looking at the tax rules, there is an important starting point. To claim a tax deduction, your contribution must be to a bona fide charitable organization. Only certain categories of exempt organizations are eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions.
Many charitable organizations are so-called “501(c)(3)” organizations (named after the section of the Tax Code that governs charities. The IRS maintains a list of qualified Code Sec. 501(c)(3) organizations. Not all charitable organizations are Code Sec. 501(c)(3)s. Churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques, for example, are not required to file for Code Sec. 501(c)(3) status. Special rules also apply to fraternal organizations, volunteer fire departments and veterans organizations. If you have any questions about a charitable organization, please contact our office.
Tax rules
In past years, many taxpayers would value the amount of their used vehicle donation based on information in a buyer’s guide. Today, the value of your used vehicle donation depends on what the charitable organization does with the vehicle.
In many cases, the charitable organization will sell your used vehicle. If the charity sells the vehicle, your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale. The charitable organization must certify that the vehicle was sold in an arm’s length transaction between unrelated parties and identify the date the vehicle was sold by the charity and the amount of the gross proceeds.
There are exceptions to the rule that your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale of your used vehicle. You may be able to deduct the vehicle’s fair market value if the charity intends to make a significant intervening use of the vehicle, a material improvement to the vehicle, or give or sell the vehicle to a qualified needy individual. If you have any questions about what a charity intends to do with your vehicle, please contact our office.
Written acknowledgment
The charitable organization must give you a written acknowledgment of your used vehicle donation. The rules differ depending on the amount of your donation. If you claim a deduction of more than $500 but not more than $5,000 for your vehicle donation, the written acknowledgment from the charity must:
Identify the charity’s name, the date and location of the donation
Describe the vehicle
Include a statement as to whether the charity provided any goods or services in return for the car other than intangible religious benefits and, if so, a description and good faith estimate of the value of the goods and services
Identify your name and taxpayer identification number
Provide the vehicle identification number
The written acknowledgement generally must be provided to you within 30 days of the sale of the vehicle. Alternatively, the charitable organization may in certain cases, provide you a completed Form 1098-C, Contributions of Motor Vehicles, Boats, and Airplanes, that contains the same information.
The written acknowledgment requirements for claiming a deduction under $500 or over $5,000 are similar to the ones described above but there are some differences. For example, if your deduction is expected to be more than $5,000 and not limited to the gross proceeds from the sale of your used vehicle, you must obtain a written appraisal of the vehicle. Our office can help guide you through the many steps of donating a vehicle valued at more than $5,000.
If you are planning to donate a used vehicle, please contact our office and we can discuss the tax rules in more detail.
The number of tax return-related identity theft incidents has almost doubled in the past three years to well over half a million reported during 2011, according to a recent report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). Identity theft in the context of tax administration generally involves the fraudulent use of someone else’s identity in order to claim a tax refund. In other cases an identity thief might steal a person’s information to obtain a job, and the thief’s employer may report income to the IRS using the legitimate taxpayer’s Social Security Number, thus making it appear that the taxpayer did not report all of his or her income.
The number of tax return-related identity theft incidents has almost doubled in the past three years to well over half a million reported during 2011, according to a recent report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). Identity theft in the context of tax administration generally involves the fraudulent use of someone else’s identity in order to claim a tax refund. In other cases an identity thief might steal a person’s information to obtain a job, and the thief’s employer may report income to the IRS using the legitimate taxpayer’s Social Security Number, thus making it appear that the taxpayer did not report all of his or her income.
In light of these dangers, the IRS has taken numerous steps to combat identity theft and protect taxpayers. There are also measures that you can take to safeguard yourself against identity theft in the future and assist the IRS in the process.
IRS does not solicit financial information via email or social media
The IRS will never request a taxpayer’s personal or financial information by email or social media such as Facebook or Twitter. Likewise, the IRS will not alert taxpayers to an audit or tax refund by email or any other form of electronic communication, such as text messages and social media channels.
If you receive a scam email claiming to be from the IRS, forward it to the IRS at phishing@irs.gov. If you discover a website that claims to be the IRS but does not begin with 'www.irs.gov', forward that link to the IRS at phishing@irs.gov.
How identity thieves operate
Identity theft scams are not limited to users of email and social media tools. Scammers may also use a phone or fax to reach their victims to solicit personal information. Other means include:
-Stealing your wallet or purse -Looking through your trash -Accessing information you provide to an unsecured Internet site.
How do I know if I am a victim?
Your identity may have been stolen if a letter from the IRS indicates more than one tax return was filed for you or the letter states you received wages from an employer you don't know. If you receive such a letter from the IRS, leading you to believe your identity has been stolen, respond immediately to the name, address or phone number on the IRS notice. If you believe the notice is not from the IRS, contact the IRS to determine if the letter is a legitimate IRS notice.
If your tax records are not currently affected by identity theft, but you believe you may be at risk due to a lost wallet, questionable credit card activity, or credit report, you need to provide the IRS with proof of your identity. You should submit a copy of your valid government-issued identification, such as a Social Security card, driver's license or passport, along with a copy of a police report and/or a completed IRS Form 14039, Identity Theft Affidavit, which should be faxed to the IRS at 1-978-684-4542.
What should I do if someone has stolen my identity?
If you discover that someone has filed a tax return using your SSN you should contact the IRS to show the income is not yours. After the IRS authenticates who you are, your tax record will be updated to reflect only your information. The IRS will use this information to minimize future occurrences.
What other precautions can I take?
There are many things you can do to protect your identity. One is to be careful while distributing your personal information. You should show employers your Social Security card to your employer at the start of a job, but otherwise do not routinely carry your card or other documents that display your SSN.
Only use secure websites while making online financial transactions, including online shopping. Generally a secure website will have an icon, such as a lock, located in the lower right-hand corner of your web browser or the address bar of the website with read “https://…” rather than simply “http://.”
Never open suspicious attachments or links, even just to see what they say. Never respond to emails from unknown senders. Install anti-virus software, keep it updated, and run it regularly.
For taxpayers planning to e-file their tax returns, the IRS recommends use of a strong password. Afterwards, save the file to a CD or flash drive and keep it in a secure location. Then delete the personal return information from the computer hard drive.
Finally, if working with an accountant, query him or her on what measures they take to protect your information.
Claiming a charitable deduction for a cash contribution is straightforward. The taxpayer claims the amount paid, whether by cash, check, credit card or some other method, if the proper records are maintained. For contributions of property, the rules can be more complex.
Claiming a charitable deduction for a cash contribution is straightforward. The taxpayer claims the amount paid, whether by cash, check, credit card or some other method, if the proper records are maintained. For contributions of property, the rules can be more complex.
Contributions of property
A taxpayer that contributes property can deduct the property's fair market value at the time of the contribution. For example, contributions of clothing and household items are not deductible unless the items are in good used condition or better. An exception to this rule allows a deduction for items that are not in at least good used condition, if the taxpayer claims a deduction of more than $500 and includes an appraisal with the taxpayer's income tax return.
Household items include furniture and furnishings, electronics, appliances, linens, and similar items. Household items do not include food, antiques and art, jewelry, and collections (such as coins).
To value used clothing, the IRS suggests using the price that buyers of used items pay in second-hand shops. However, there is no fixed formula or method for determining the value of clothing. Similarly, the value of used household items is usually much lower than the price paid for a new item, the IRS instructs. Formulas (such as a percentage of cost) are not accepted by the IRS.
Vehicles
The rules are different for "qualified vehicles," which are cars, boats and airplanes. If the taxpayer claims a deduction of more than $500, the taxpayer is allowed to deduct the smaller of the vehicle’s fair market value on the date of the contribution, or the proceeds from the sale of the vehicle by the organization.
There are two exceptions to this rule. If the organization uses or improves the vehicle before transferring it, the taxpayer can deduct the vehicle’s fair market value when the contribution was made. If the organization gives the vehicle away, or sells it far well below fair market value, to a needy individual to further the organization’s purpose, the taxpayer can claim a fair market value deduction. This latter exception does not apply to a vehicle sold at auction.
To determine the value of a car, the IRS instructs that "blue book" prices may be used as "clues" for comparison with current sales and offerings. Taxpayers should use the price listed in a used car guide for a private party sale, not the dealer retail value. To use the listed price, the taxpayer’s vehicle must be the same make, model and year and be in the same condition.
Most items of property that a person owns and uses for personal purposes or investment are capital assets. If the value of a capital asset is greater than the basis of the item, the taxpayer generally can deduct the fair market value of the item. The taxpayer must have held the property for longer than one year.
Please contact our office for more information about the tax treatment of charitable contributions.
Depreciation is a reasonable allowance for wear and tear on property used in a trade or business or for the production of income. Property is depreciable if it has a useful life greater than one year and depreciates in value. Property that appreciates in value may also depreciate if subject to wear and tear. Depreciation ends in the tax year that the asset is retired from service (by sale, exchange, abandonment or destruction) or that the asset is fully depreciated.
Depreciation is a reasonable allowance for wear and tear on property used in a trade or business or for the production of income. Property is depreciable if it has a useful life greater than one year and depreciates in value. Property that appreciates in value may also depreciate if subject to wear and tear. Depreciation ends in the tax year that the asset is retired from service (by sale, exchange, abandonment or destruction) or that the asset is fully depreciated.
Assets with useful lives of one year or less can be deducted as current expenses in the year of their costs. Depreciation cannot be claimed on an asset that is acquired and disposed of in the same year.
Depreciation begins in the tax year that the property is placed in service for either the production of income or for use in a trade or business. Property generally is considered placed in service when it is in a condition or state of readiness to be used on a regular, ongoing basis. The property must be available for a specifically assigned function in a trade or business (or for the production of income).
An asset actually put to use in a trade or business is clearly considered placed in service. If, on the other hand, an asset is not actually put to use, it is generally not considered placed in service unless the taxpayer has done everything he or she can to put the asset to use. For example, a barge was considered placed in service in the year it was acquired, even though it could not be actually used because the body of water was frozen. For a building that is intended to house machinery and equipment, the building's state of readiness is determined without regard to whether the machinery and equipment has been placed in service. Leased property is placed in service by the lessor when the property is held out for lease.
Generally, the year property is placed in service is the tax year of acquisition, but it could be a later time. An asset cannot be placed in service any sooner than the time that the business actually begins to operate.
In the case of agriculture, livestock cannot be depreciated until it reaches maturity and can be used; orchards cannot be depreciated until the trees produce marketable quantities of crops. Prior to those times, costs must be capitalized and cannot be written off.
Especially at year-end, placing an asset in service before the new year can mean the difference between claiming a substantial amount of depreciation on this year's return instead of waiting a full year. If you have any questions on how to qualify a business asset under this deadline, please contact this office.
You may have done some spring cleaning and found that you have a lot of clothes that you no longer wear or want, and would like to donate to charity. Used clothing that you want to donate to charity and take a charitable deduction for, however, is subject to a few rules and requirements.
You may have done some spring cleaning and found that you have a lot of clothes that you no longer wear or want, and would like to donate to charity. Used clothing that you want to donate to charity and take a charitable deduction for, however, is subject to a few rules and requirements.
Under IRS guidelines, clothing, furniture, and other household items must be in good used condition or better, to be deductible. Shirts with stains or pants with frayed hems just won't cut it. Furthermore, if the item(s) of used clothing are not in good used condition or better, and you wish to deduct more than $500 for a single piece of clothing, the IRS requires a professional appraisal.
For donations of less than $250, you must obtain a receipt from the charity, reflecting the donor's name, date and location of the contribution, and a reasonably detailed description of the donation. It is your responsibility to obtain this written acknowledgement of your donation.
Used clothing contributions worth more than $500
If you are deducting more than $500 with respect to one piece of used clothing you donate, you must file Form 8283, Noncash Charitable Contributions, with the IRS. For donated items of used clothing worth more than $500 each, you must attach a qualified appraisal report is to your tax return. The Form 8283 asks you to include information such as the date you acquired the item(s) and how you acquired the item(s) (for example, were the clothes a holiday gift or did you buy the items at the store).
Determining the fair market value of used clothing
You may also need to include the method you used to determine the value of the used clothing. According to the IRS, the valuation of used clothing does not necessarily lend itself to the use of fixed formulas or methods. Typically, the value of used clothing that you donate, is going to be much less than you when first paid for the item. A rule of thumb, is that for items such as used clothing, fair market value is generally the price at which buyers of used items pay for used clothing in consignment or thrift stores, such as the Salvation Army.
To substantiate your deduction, ask for a receipt from the donor that attests to the fact that the clothing you donated with in good, used condition, or better. Moreover, you may want to take pictures of the clothing.
If you need have questions about valuing and substantiating your charitable donations, please contact our office.
Whether a parent who employs his or her child in a family business must withhold FICA and pay FUTA taxes will depend on the age of the teenager, the amount of income the teenager earns and the type of business.
Whether a parent who employs his or her child in a family business must withhold FICA and pay FUTA taxes will depend on the age of the teenager, the amount of income the teenager earns and the type of business.
FICA and FUTA taxes
A child under age 18 working for a parent is not subject to FICA so long as the parent's business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership in which each partner is a parent of the child (if there are additional partners, the taxes must be withheld). FUTA does not have to be paid until the child reaches age 21. These rules apply to a child's services in a trade or business.
If the child's services are for other than a trade or business, such as domestic work in the parent's private home, FICA and FUTA taxes do not apply until the child reaches 21.
The rules are also different if the child is employed by a corporation controlled by his or her parent. In this case, FICA and FUTA taxes must be paid.
Federal income taxes
Federal income taxes should be withheld, regardless of the age of the child, unless the child is subject to an exemption. Students are not automatically exempt, though. The teenager has to show that he or she expects no federal income tax liability for the current tax year and that the teenager had no income tax liability the prior tax year either. Additionally, the teenager cannot claim an exemption from withholding if he or she can be claimed as a dependent on another person's return, has more than $250 unearned income, and has income from both earned and unearned sources totaling more than $800.
Bona fide employee
Remember also, that whenever a parent employs his or her child, the child must be a bona fide employee, and the employer-employee relationship must be established or the IRS will not allow the business expense deduction for the child's wages or salary. To establish a standard employer-employee relationship, the parent should assign regular duties and hours to the child, and the pay must be reasonable with the industry norm for the work. Too generous pay will be disallowed by the IRS.
Maintaining good financial records is an important part of running a successful business. Not only will good records help you identify strengths and weaknesses in your business' operations, but they will also help out tremendously if the IRS comes knocking on your door.
Maintaining good financial records is an important part of running a successful business. Not only will good records help you identify strengths and weaknesses in your business' operations, but they will also help out tremendously if the IRS comes knocking on your door.
The IRS requires that business owners keep adequate books and records and that they be available when needed for the administration of any provision of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., an audit). Here are some basic guidelines:
Copies of tax returns. You must keep records that support each item of income or deduction on a business return until the statute of limitations for that return expires. In general, the statute of limitations is three years after the date on which the return was filed. Because the IRS may go back as far as six years to audit a tax return when a substantial understatement of income is suspected, it may be prudent to keep records for at least six years. In cases of suspected tax fraud or if a return is never filed, the statute of limitations never expires.
Employment taxes. Chances are that if you have employees, you've accumulated a great deal of paperwork over the years. The IRS isn't looking to give you a break either: you are required to keep all employment tax records for at least 4 years after the date the tax becomes due or is paid, whichever is later. These records include payroll tax returns and employee time documentation.
Business assets. Records relating to business assets should be kept until the statute of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the asset in a taxable disposition. Original acquisition documentation, (e.g. receipts, escrow statements) should be kept to compute any depreciation, amortization, or depletion deduction, and to later determine your cost basis for computing gain or loss when you sell or otherwise dispose of the asset. If your business has leased property that qualifies as a capital lease, you should retain the underlying lease agreement in case the IRS ever questions the nature of the lease.
For property received in a nontaxable exchange, additional documentation must be kept. With this type of transaction, your cost basis in the new property is the same as the cost basis of the property you disposed of, increased by the money you paid. You must keep the records on the old property, as well as on the new property, until the statute of limitations expires for the year in which you dispose of the new property in a taxable disposition.
Inventories.If your business maintains inventory, your recordkeeping requirements are even more arduous. The use of special inventory valuation methods (e.g. LIFO and UNICAP) may prolong the record retention period. For example, if you use the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting for inventory, you will need to maintain the records necessary to substantiate all costs since the first year you used LIFO.
Specific Computerized Systems Requirements
If your company has modified, or is considering modifying its computer, recordkeeping and/or imaging systems, it is essential that you take the IRS's recently updated recordkeeping requirements into consideration.
If you use a computerized system, you must be able to produce sufficient legible records to support and verify amounts shown on your business tax return and determine your correct tax liability. To meet this qualification, the machine-sensible records must reconcile with your books and business tax return. These records must provide enough detail to identify the underlying source documents. You must also keep all machine-sensible records and a complete description of the computerized portion of your recordkeeping system.
Some additional advice: when your records are no longer needed for tax purposes, think twice before discarding them; they may still be needed for other nontax purposes. Besides the wealth of information good records provide for business planning purposes, insurance companies and/or creditors may have different record retention requirements than the IRS.